It depends on what you mean by “registration”.
The debate:
Large disability providers continue to lobby for universal mandatory provider registration, arguing it will enhance participant safety and the quality of supports, create an even playing field, and increase regulator oversight of the 90%+ of providers who are currently unregistered.
Leading disability advocates and some smaller providers argue universal provider registration would be a huge mistake because it would reduce participant choice and control, drive out small providers (reducing access), decrease competition for large providers, reduce incentives for innovation, and do nothing of itself to increase service quality or participant safety.
So who’s right when it comes to small allied health NDIS providers? And is there a middle path?
Context:
Under current rules, registration isn’t required for most of the work allied health providers perform to support self-managed and plan-managed NDIS participants (who make up over 90% of all participants). Among other things, unregistered allied health providers can’t support NDIA-managed participants or use regulated restrictive practices.
Why not register?
Getting and staying registered is too expensive and time-consuming for many small allied health providers – especially for providers who also work with other clients outside the disability sector (e.g. in health or education).
Many NDIS registration obligations duplicate existing professional and health regulations, requiring registered allied health providers to develop systems to comply with two sets of overlapping rules.
Unregistered ≠ unregulated:
Most evidence-based allied health professionals in Australia are regulated either by AHPRA, or by self-regulatory bodies and state statutory codes of conduct that impose similar requirements, including rules about professional ethics, standards of practice, scope of practice, mandatory declarations, complaints, certification, continuous professional development, and professional indemnity insurance. All providers – including unregistered providers – must abide by the NDIS Code of Conduct.
Deemed registration proposal:
In August 2024, the government released the advice of the NDIS Provider and Worker Registration Taskforce. The task force acknowledged the arguments of disability advocates and proposed that, to avoid duplicate accreditation and registration requirements:
- AHPRA-registered allied health professionals have their existing registration recognised for NDIS registration purposes; and
- consideration be given to the appropriateness of extending this recognition to allied health professionals who are self-regulated by rules that mirror AHPRA’s requirements (e.g. speech pathologists).
Avoiding false binaries:
Everyone wants participants to be safe and to receive high quality supports. But, as recent history makes clear, NDIS registration does not guarantee safety or quality.
Regardless of registration status, providers can – and should – look for practical ways to work with participants to improve the quality and safety of their services, including with robust worker screening processes and complaints and incidents management systems.
Bottom line:
- Mandatory registration of allied health providers under existing rules would be likely to reduce participant choice and control because it would drive many small allied health providers out of the sector.
- Recognising allied health providers’ existing health registrations/self-regulations as NDIS registration appears to be a sensible, risk-weighted approach. But we don’t yet know whether the government – now, or after the election – agrees or will agree with the task force’s recommendations.
- Whatever happens, allied health NDIS providers must, in partnership with the NDIS participants they serve, continue to:
- assert their value in increasing participant choice and control; and
- work to improve the quality and safety of their supports.
Get ready:
NDIS Incident Management and Reportable Incidents System Policy and Procedures
NDIS Complaints Management and Resolution System Policy Document and Complaint and Feedback Form
Go deeper:
NDIS participants want safety and quality…but they also want choice. Article by Dr George Taleporos in The Australian (paywalled). 27 March 2025.
NDIS Provider and Worker Registration Taskforce Advice
Read more:
Allied Health NDIS Providers: Keep your eye on the ball in 2025!
Allied health NDIS providers must face facts, and make painful – but necessary – changes to survive
